
Survivors of the Plague
A budget-priced Vampire Survivors clone wearing a dark medieval plague skin - honest about what it is, but thin on reasons to pick it over the genre's heavier hitters.
Compare Prices(0 stores)
Loading prices...
We may earn a commission when you buy games through links on this page — at no extra cost to you. It never affects our rankings or verdicts.
Screenshots & Media

About Survivors of the Plague
I want to root for Survivors of the Plague. There is something quietly admirable about a solo-or-micro indie developer dropping a 2D action roguelike into a genre crowded with loud, well-funded entries, setting it in a dark medieval world choked by the Scarlet Death, and asking almost nothing for the privilege of trying it. That scrappy underdog energy is real. The problem is that good intentions only carry a game so far before the actual design has to do the work. At its core, this is a horde-survival roguelike in the mold of Vampire Survivors. You pick from a roster of characters - including classes that lean into distinct stat profiles - and then survive escalating waves of infected enemies while collecting upgrades and weapon combinations between rounds. The loop is familiar by design: hold a direction, watch numbers grow, chase build synergies. The Scarlet Plague theming gives it a dark fantasy medieval coat - demons, zombies, and plague-touched creatures fill the arenas - and there is an adventure layer promising rescueable survivors, scattered cure ingredients, and mysteries to unravel across inhospitable locations. On paper, the scope is genuinely ambitious for a tiny studio. In practice, the experience is rougher than its ambitions suggest. The visual presentation mixes pixel sprites of noticeably different resolutions, which creates an inconsistent aesthetic that can feel less like intentional retro charm and more like a resource constraint the developer acknowledged themselves during the game's development. The difficulty curve appears steep from the earliest moments, which some players will find energising and others will find punishing without clear feedback on why a run failed. The quest system adds a layer beyond raw survival - tracking objectives mid-run and chasing ingredient hunts gives the loops a bit more texture than pure wave-clearing - but the overall content depth is thin compared to the genre titans it is rubbing shoulders with. Three user reviews after nearly two years on Steam tells its own quiet story. Who is this actually for? Genuinely: players who want a low-stakes entry point into the horde-survivor format, who do not need the genre's most polished execution, and who find something meaningful in supporting a tiny independent project. The controller support is solid, the achievements give short-session players something to chase, and the dark fantasy skin - plague-ridden wastelands, cursed enemies, a world tipping toward extinction - does carry its own modest atmosphere. I respect the craft of making anything at all. But if you have already put hours into Vampire Survivors or any of its more refined successors, Survivors of the Plague will feel like a step sideways into rougher terrain rather than a new destination worth spending time in. Kai, Scout Team
Tags
System Requirements
Minimum
- OS
- Windows 10/11
- Memory
- 8 GB RAM
- Storage
- 700 MB available space
- Graphics
- Nvidia GTX 1050 or Radeon equivalent
- Processor
- i3 or AMD equivalent
Recommended
- OS
- Windows 10/11
- Memory
- 16 GB RAM
- Storage
- 700 MB available space
- Graphics
- Nvidia GTX 1060 Ti or Radeon equivalent
- Processor
- i5 or AMD equivalent
Community Discussion
Be the first to comment on Survivors of the Plague.
Reviews & Ratings
No ratings available
Game Info
- Developer
- Mol Cruir Games
- Publisher
- Mol Cruir Games
- Release Date
- Aug 4, 2023