Rainbow Legends

I have put a lot of hours into deck builders that promise innovation and then funnel you into the same damage-race loop. Rainbow Legends actually breaks that pattern in a way that kept me recalculating every turn. The core rule is blunt and elegant: at the end of each round, whichever side controls more tiles on the grid deals damage equal to the difference. That single design decision changes how you read every card in your hand. A high-damage attack that lands in a corner nobody cares about is a wasted resource. A modest placement card that cuts off the opponent's expansion corridor is worth three big swings. For strategy players, that reframing of value is genuinely exciting. The systems sitting on top of that territorial foundation are deep enough to justify repeated runs. There are eight distinct classes, each carrying five unique storylines and dedicated card pools, so the Mage's chain-and-duplicate combos play nothing like the Tyrant's soldier-command, high-risk style. Layered onto that are over 100 relics and hundreds of cards with individual upgrade paths, plus structures you place directly onto the battlefield. Tools like the Twin Rune, which causes an attack card to resolve twice on controlled territory, or the Explosive Rune, which punishes opponents for holding certain tiles, push the game toward a build-crafting depth that Slay the Spire fans will recognize but territory purists will find freshly angled. Enemy attacks are telegraphed, so reading the board one turn ahead is a real, learnable skill rather than a guessing game. That telegraphing actually makes this a better entry point for new roguelike players than the genre's reputation suggests: you can see the threat, and the question is whether your positional plan accounts for it. The launch, though, has been bumpy. Player reception sits at Mostly Positive on Steam, and the criticisms doing the rounds are legitimate. Balance across the eight classes is uneven, with some factions hitting reliably hard while others feel like they need another design pass to be truly viable. The English translation is incomplete in places, which is a real problem when the entire decision space of a deck builder depends on reading card text accurately. Reviewers have also flagged bugs that can interrupt runs mid-session. The developers have been actively pushing fixes and have committed to further balance adjustments, which is encouraging, but right now the experience is rougher than the underlying concept deserves. A free demo is on Steam if you want to stress-test the translation situation before committing. For the strategy-minded player who cares more about decision architecture than visual polish, the positional framework here is worth tolerating the current warts. The class variety alone gives this meaningful replay width, and the relic synergies have the kind of late-run compounding that makes you restart immediately after a loss. World-building and narrative are thin, and anyone expecting a rich RPG story will leave disappointed. But if what you want is a deck builder that forces you to think spatially rather than arithmetically, Rainbow Legends is doing something genuinely distinct. Wait for another patch or two if bugs make you quit early; otherwise the core loop already holds up.

Diego · Scout Team

Strategy & simulation

Be the first to comment on Rainbow Legends.