Our Adventurer Guild

I went in skeptical, because the hand-drawn art looked like something assembled over a weekend, and solo-dev tactics games have a high failure rate on the depth-vs-polish axis. Two dozen hours later I am still planning my next class promotions, so the skepticism did not survive contact. Our Adventurer Guild is a guild-management tactics hybrid that asks you to run the back office AND win the battles: recruit adventurers from the tavern, pay their daily wages, slot them into quest parties, craft gear from mission loot, manage inter-party relationships, then personally direct the grid combat when a quest goes live. The two halves are tightly coupled in a way that earns genuine respect. Neglect your finances and your best fighters walk out; ignore the tactical layer and they come home in boxes. The class system is where the serious decision-making lives. You start with six novice archetypes, Warrior, Defender, Priest, Archer, Rogue and Mage, each costing 300 gold to swap into. Prove your adventurers capable and the ten veteran classes open up, including Arcane Knights, Paladins, Monks, Bards and Guardians, each requiring specific stat thresholds and, in some cases, recruiting dedicated trainers to the guild first. Beyond that sits a tier of master classes I had not fully unlocked at twenty-plus hours in. The promotion path is stat-gated rather than level-gated, which means you are actively shaping growth curves rather than just waiting for XP bars to fill. That is exactly the kind of decision architecture I want from this genre. The Bravery System adds a combat-layer risk dial: push it too hard and your fighters panic or exhaust themselves, calibrate it correctly and you pull off comeback wins that feel earned rather than lucky. The criticisms are real and worth naming clearly. Quest variety is thin. Missions shuffle between collecting resources, hitting objectives, and killing a target, and the map grids start feeling repetitive before the mid-game. The writing is tropey and voluminous in equal measure; the bickering dynamic between your Guild Master character and deputy Piola lands for some players and grates for others, and the overall story is functional rather than compelling. Community reviewers consistently flag difficulty spikes in main story missions, where the gap between standard quests and boss-tier content can force grinding that disrupts the otherwise clean progression rhythm. The late-game wage economy also creates a structural tension where running multiple strong squads becomes financially punishing, which can channel you into a single-party approach rather than a true roster management game. Here is the part where I tell you why none of that should stop a tactics player from buying this. The fundamentals are solved. Grid combat rewards positioning and party composition in ways that recall Final Fantasy Tactics and XCOM without copying either wholesale. The optional permadeath toggle raises stakes without being mandatory. Randomly generated recruits plus 22 classes across three tiers plus a New Game+ mode with scalable difficulty modifiers gives the game real replay legs. The tutorial is patient enough for newcomers without being insulting to veterans, and the in-game tips system does solid reference work once the training wheels come off. If you have never played a tactics-management hybrid before, this is a better entry point than most titles that market themselves as accessible. If you have 200 hours in Battle Brothers, you will recognize the DNA, find the depth slightly lighter than you prefer, and probably still sink 40 hours into it anyway.

Diego · Scout Team

Strategy & simulation

Be the first to comment on Our Adventurer Guild.