Global Ops: Commando Libya

My bar for a budget third-person shooter is low but it is not zero, and Global Ops: Commando Libya clears it by about the width of a bootlace. Spectral Games built a nine-mission campaign around Gears of War's cover system - roadie-run, snap-to-wall, roll sideways, repeat - and while the controls are lifted wholesale from Epic's playbook, the bones hold together better than the 37 Metacritic score implies. Rolling between shoulder-high walls, using the occasional destructible cover piece, and blasting through scripted vehicle segments across Greenland and North Africa actually functions without constantly fighting the input system. That is faint praise, but in this tier of game it matters. Here is what does not hold together. The enemy AI is in a category of its own. Opponents will sprint straight into your barrel, glue themselves to cover and never leave, or simply ignore you while your AI partner walks into your line of fire for the fifth time. There is no crouch, no jump, no ability to shoot from cover without fully exposing yourself, and no on-screen key binding list, so you will discover that F is the melee key required for a stealth kill only by mashing the keyboard. The shooting itself is spongy and inconsistent - time-to-kill varies so randomly per enemy that you lose the feedback loop a shooter needs to feel good. Hit registration feedback is close to nonexistent. On a 144hz monitor with a lightweight mouse you will feel the slop immediately. The three multiplayer modes - deathmatch and a domination-style capture variant among them - are functionally dead. Servers are empty and the connection process reportedly requires manually entering another player's IP address. Forget about it. This is a singleplayer experience whether you want it to be or not. The nine-chapter campaign runs about eight hours on normal, a little less if you ignore the story, and the story is very easy to ignore. Two CIA operatives named West and Pope swap action-movie obscenities while chasing a nuke through environments that recycle the same texture sets from level to level, with the Arctic opening being the one exception. The honest read on this game in 2025 depends entirely on why you are considering it. As a serious shooter it falls short on every performance metric that matters: gunfeel, AI pressure, movement options, weapon variety, and any form of multiplayer viability. As an irony-aware time capsule of early 2010s budget console port culture - complete with Unreal 3 engine bloom, stiff facial animations, and dialogue that reads like a 14-year-old's screenplay - there is a very specific audience who will get exactly what they came for. That audience is small. Everyone else will uninstall inside an hour. Fred, Scout Team